{"id":16596,"date":"2026-06-14T06:47:14","date_gmt":"2026-06-14T05:47:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/innovatenews.site\/index.php\/2026\/06\/14\/the-fast-charging-wars-are-over-now-its-time-to-fix-usb-c\/"},"modified":"2026-06-14T06:47:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-14T05:47:19","slug":"the-fast-charging-wars-are-over-now-its-time-to-fix-usb-c","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/innovatenews.site\/index.php\/2026\/06\/14\/the-fast-charging-wars-are-over-now-its-time-to-fix-usb-c\/","title":{"rendered":"The fast-charging wars are over. Now it\u2019s time to fix USB-C"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The topic The fast-charging wars are over. Now it\u2019s time to fix USB-C<\/strong> is currently the subject of lively discussion \u2014 readers and analysts are keeping a close eye on developments.<\/p>\n

This is taking place in a dynamic environment: companies\u2019 decisions and competitors\u2019 reactions can quickly change the picture.<\/p>\n

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more.<\/p>\n

You don\u2019t have to be an old timer to remember when charging power was once a major differential for the best smartphones. The long march to 40W charging quickly spiraled into a spec war that spawned countless rival standards: HyperCharge, SuperVOOC, SuperCharge, Samsung AFC, Apple 2.4A. and Qualcomm\u2019s Quick Charge as options for brands unable to build their own. It was a mess, and we\u2019ve been dealing with the fallout ever since when trying to buy fast-charging accessories for all our gadgets.<\/p>\n

Eventually, the universal USB Power Delivery specification caught up in raw power in the USB-C era, but this was further complicated by branching enhancements such as EDR for laptops and PPS for low-power devices. It\u2019s taken years for the standard to reach capabilities that match what rival proprietary standards have long offered. Thankfully, we\u2019re now at the point where the power wars are over; it\u2019s time to consolidate around the sensible universal option.<\/p>\n

If you look at the past two or three generations of the fastest-charging phones, power levels have plateaued. While you\u2019ll still find the odd marketing claim breaching the 100W barrier, 60-80W of real deliverable power appears to be the most that we can throw at our compact smartphone batteries. And that\u2019s plenty fast, too. Even the largest 7,000 mAh phone batteries can be fully charged in about 40 minutes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

There are stragglers, of course. Samsung\u2019s Galaxy S26 Ultra has only recently closed the gap on the industry\u2019s fastest, but the popular iPhone and Pixel series remain some way behind. This is especially true when we look outside the top-of-the-range flagship \u2014 baseline models are often notably slower.<\/p>\n

Still, peel back the numbers, and there\u2019s something more important at play. The fastest charging phones are increasingly less dependent on their proprietary protocols to achieve fast charging times and power (which is seldom sustained for more than a few minutes anyway). We\u2019re now at the point where universal standards have caught the proprietary models and offer broader accessory compatibility to boot.<\/p>\n

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is an extreme example, promising up to 90W over the everyday USB Power Delivery PPS specification. Likewise, the OnePlus 15 and OPPO Find X9 Ultra can hit above 40W via PPS as well, with only a minor impact on full charge times. The key factor is that the average power draw during fast charging is often well below 40W, regardless of whether you use SuperVOOC or Power Delivery.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, it\u2019s too early to celebrate just yet. The mess that is the USB charging landscape means that even consolidating around Power Delivery remains a challenge. Today, even if two phones can receive more than 50W under this universal specification, it doesn\u2019t mean consumers will easily achieve it when they shop for third-party chargers and power banks.<\/p>\n

for example, Motorola\u2019s TurboPower spec is based on the USB PD specification but requires a special E-marked USB-C cable rated at 6.5A to reach its 60W rating. Fail that test and you\u2019re stuck with sluggish power rates. Google\u2019s Pixel 10 Pro XL throws a spanner in the works by working nicely with 9V\/3A charging for 27W but requiring a 20V\/1.6A-capable plug to hit their peak 37W.<\/p>\n

Even within Samsung\u2019s pretty decent ecosystem, 9V\/5A and 16V\/3A are used to achieve 45W charging, depending on the model, and you\u2019ll need a different cable for the 5A option. Picking the right USB-C charger and cable can still be a problem even within the same ecosystem. Apple hasn\u2019t helped the situation by moving towards USB PD AVS for optimized iPhone 17 charging rather than Android\u2019s pick of USB PD PPS \u2014 though at least it retains compatibility with the main standard.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n

The good news is that the technical foundations already exist. USB Power Delivery PPS can dynamically adjust voltage and current to closely mirror the behavior of many proprietary charging standards. In practice, that means manufacturers no longer need entirely separate ecosystems to deliver fast, battery-friendly charging.<\/p>\n

The challenge is that companies continue to implement the standard differently. Different voltage profiles, current limits, cable requirements, and certification programs create friction where there should be simplicity. Consumers shouldn\u2019t need to understand the difference between 9V\/5A and 20V\/2A, PPS ranges, E-marker requirements, or AVS support just to buy a charger that works at full speed. And that\u2019s another problem: brands continue to be terrible at signifying when a device is actually charging optimally.<\/p>\n

Fortunately, manufacturers aren\u2019t the only stakeholders pushing the industry toward consistency. If phone makers won\u2019t standardize voluntarily, the accessory market might well do it for them.<\/p>\n

Proprietary standards are already seldom supported by third-party power banks and plugs, which has helped push the market toward USB Power Delivery. There\u2019s also been a gradual increase in support for both higher-voltage PPS capabilities and Apple\u2019s AVS implementation, helping modern chargers cover more devices than ever before.\u00a0However, this is often reserved only for the more expensive models.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, a charger that powers a laptop, tablet, phone, earbuds, and a portable gaming device is far more appealing than one optimized for a single smartphone brand. The paradigm is thankfully shifting; it\u2019s no longer about buying the right charger for a specific device, but about finding the one that powers all your gadgets. Unfortunately, that still requires busywork and more knowledge than most consumers should be expected to have, but it\u2019s becoming slightly easier each year.<\/p>\n

The industry has spent more than a decade fighting over charging standards. With charging speeds now largely plateaued, interoperability remains the final challenge. The next phase isn\u2019t about reaching 150W or 200W \u2014 it\u2019s about ensuring that any decent USB-C charger can deliver the performance consumers expect, regardless of the logo on the phone.<\/p>\n

Thank you for being part of our community. Read our\u00a0Comment Policy before posting.<\/p>\n